|
| Recent
Articles |
French Police: Firefox Oui, IE Non
The French Police Force has chosen to replace installations of Internet Explorer
on its network with the open source Firefox browser. Firefox
and its mail client...
Sorry,
Microsoft; ODF Lives On In Mass.
Surprise, surprise. Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney appointed a successor to
the departed CIO of the state's Information Technology Division...
AMD Can Subpoena Firms For Intel Suit
Third parties that received subpoenas from AMD for its antitrust case against
Intel had been reluctant to comply, citing non-disclosure agreements with Intel.
US District Court Judge Joseph J. Farnan Jr ruled...
Opportunities
2006 - Usefulness
2006 is going to be a year where the creators of web technology have the opportunity
to make their services better in terms of integration, usability, and usefulness.
Your
Next Job Depends On Google
It's not who you know that will get you the next cushy corporate job, but what
you know, and that 'what' is everyone's favorite search advertising company...
Are
Bloggers In Legal Jeopardy?
So let me get this straight: if someone annoys me online, via a web site or in
an email, and doesn't disclose their real name, I can have them hauled off to
SuperMax?
|
|
|
|
02.13.06
Privacy
Experts Advice Against Google Desktop 3
 By
Nathan Weinberg
The Electronic Frontier Foundation, go-to guys for legal issues in Web 2.0, have
recommended against
using the latest version of Google Desktop.
The EFF says that if you use the "search across computers" feature (which, don't
worry, is double-super opt-in), your data is placed on Google's servers, which
makes it available for subpoena by government organizations (normally, such an
invasion would require a search warrant).
From their website:
Google today announced a new "feature" of its
Google Desktop software that greatly increases the risk to consumer privacy. If
a consumer chooses to use it, the new "Search Across Computers" feature will store
copies of the user's Word documents, PDFs, spreadsheets and other text-based documents
on Google's own servers, to enable searching from any one of the user's computers.
EFF urges consumers not to use this feature, because it will make their personal
data more vulnerable to subpoenas from the government and possibly private litigants,
while providing a convenient one-stop-shop for hackers who've obtained a user's
Google password.
"Coming on the heels of serious consumer concern about government snooping into
Google's search logs, it's shocking that Google expects its users to now trust
it with the contents of their personal computers," said EFF Staff Attorney Kevin
Bankston. "… The government could then demand these personal files with only a
subpoena rather than the search warrant it would need to seize the same things
from your home or business, and in many cases you wouldn't even be notified in
time to challenge it. Other litigants-your spouse, your business partners or rivals,
whoever-could also try to cut out the middleman (you) and subpoena Google for
your files."
The privacy problem arises because the Electronic Communication Privacy Act of
1986, or ECPA, gives only limited privacy protection to emails and other files
that are stored with online service providers-much less privacy than the legal
protections for the same information when it's on your computer at home. And even
that lower level of legal protection could disappear if Google uses your data
for marketing purposes. Google says it is not yet scanning the files it copies
from your hard drive in order to serve targeted advertising, but it hasn't ruled
out the possibility, and Google's current privacy policy appears to allow it.
While the EFF is right that Google's latest features present new legal and privacy
problems for users, you can see in the
comments at Slashdot that there is a lot of FUD being spread around, since
so many people do not understand the intricacies of the situation. Since it isn't
in the EFF's interest to correct them, maybe Google could do a better job calming
down users over these concerns? The Google blog moves too slow. If Scoble were
a Googler, he'd already be on top of it.
|
